# SRG

**URL:** https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/c/grammars/spanish-resource-grammar/27.md?page=1

[Latest](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/latest.md) · [Categories](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/categories.md) · [Tags](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/tags.md)

**Page:** 2

---

## [Token mapping rules for the SRG](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/token-mapping-rules-for-the-srg/856)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [December 16, 2022, 11:46am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/token-mapping-rules-for-the-srg/856 "2022-12-16T11:46:55Z")

</div>

I have a grammar which has: (1) token mapping types; (2) a lexical filtering rule; and (3) a couple of sample generic and native lexical entries as follows: In generics.tdl: v\_np\_ge := v\_np\*\_le & \[ STEM \< "v\_np\*\_le" \>,…

---

## [Moving a constraint into a new supertype breaks the grammar](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/moving-a-constraint-into-a-new-supertype-breaks-the-grammar/858)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [November 21, 2022, 4:07pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/moving-a-constraint-into-a-new-supertype-breaks-the-grammar/858 "2022-11-21T16:07:03Z")

</div>

This seems really basic but I can’t spot the problem, maybe someone could easily remind me what I’m forgetting. The following works (the grammar compiles): dormir\_v := v\_-\_le & \[ STEM \< "dormir" \>, SYNSEM.LKEYS…

---

## [Creating generic entries for the SRG](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/creating-generic-entries-for-the-srg/855)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [November 21, 2022, 9:34am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/creating-generic-entries-for-the-srg/855 "2022-11-21T09:34:13Z")

</div>

Many thanks for my colleagues for all the help with setting up the SRG generic machinery so far. (See also Handling UNKnown words with ACE+SRG for general discussion.) I now have a grammar which includes token mapping…

---

## [Debugging SRG generic lexical entry updates](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/debugging-srg-generic-lexical-entry-updates/854)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 7\
**Last updated:** [November 15, 2022, 2:24pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/debugging-srg-generic-lexical-entry-updates/854 "2022-11-15T14:24:03Z")

</div>

(See also Handling UNKnown words with ACE+SRG for more general discussion). I am trying to work from example (using jacy) to intruduce token mapping and properly working generic lexical entries to SRG. It’s a bit comp…

---

## [Handling UNKnown words with ACE+SRG](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/handling-unknown-words-with-ace-srg/833)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 16\
**Last updated:** [November 14, 2022, 11:25am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/handling-unknown-words-with-ace-srg/833 "2022-11-14T11:25:15Z")

</div>

(Note: this is a distinct issue from Using generic lexical entries with the SRG+ACE) With old SRG (the logon version), which uses Freeling 3.0, using the logon LKB, I can parse sentences with things like proper nouns: …

---

## [Order of tag options in YY input in SRG treebanks](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/order-of-tag-options-in-yy-input-in-srg-treebanks/839)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [October 21, 2022, 3:52pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/order-of-tag-options-in-yy-input-in-srg-treebanks/839 "2022-10-21T15:52:24Z")

</div>

Does anyone have any idea about whether the Freeling tag options in the SRG TIBIDABO treebanks are ordered by probability? (Montse does not remember). Note the two different options for “Hasta” below: (0, 0, 1, 0, "has…

---

## [Using generic lexical entries with the SRG+ACE](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/using-generic-lexical-entries-with-the-srg-ace/819)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [October 3, 2022, 9:48am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/using-generic-lexical-entries-with-the-srg-ace/819 "2022-10-03T09:48:42Z")

</div>

I need to be able to handle unknown words in the SRG. There is already a file called generics.tdl (click on the link to see the contents). I included it in the ACE compilation process (by uncommenting the following lin…

---

## [Setting up SRG with LKB](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/setting-up-srg-with-lkb/816)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [September 29, 2022, 3:10pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/setting-up-srg-with-lkb/816 "2022-09-29T15:10:31Z")

</div>

How do I set up SRG with Freeling and with LKB-FOS? I know it is working for people who already have an older version of Freeling installed along with the logon tree. But I think I (a) don’t have that old version install…

---

## [Parsing punctuation marks with SRG (using ACE)](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/parsing-punctuation-marks-with-srg-using-ace/804)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [August 31, 2022, 1:09pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/parsing-punctuation-marks-with-srg-using-ace/804 "2022-08-31T13:09:11Z")

</div>

One issue that arises with trying to use ACE with the SRG is punctuation marks. Currently, if I try to parse: (1, 0, 1, \<0:2\>, 1, "el" "el", 0, "DA0MS0", "DA0MS0" 1) (2, 1, 2, \<3:8\>, 1, "perro" "perro", 0, "NCMS000", "…

---

## [Missing freeling tags (or Updating SRG lexicon for latest version of freeling?)](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/missing-freeling-tags-or-updating-srg-lexicon-for-latest-version-of-freeling/793)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@olzama](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/olzama)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [August 31, 2022, 11:43am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/missing-freeling-tags-or-updating-srg-lexicon-for-latest-version-of-freeling/793 "2022-08-31T11:43:46Z")

</div>

Thanks to Luis @lmc, Francis @bond, and @Dan, we can now run ACE on SRG, as documented here. The dependency for morphological analysis there is Freeling, and we are currently experimenting with using the latest version.…

[Previous page](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/c/grammars/spanish-resource-grammar/27.md)
