# Get ACE to generate a specific phrase using constraints?

**URL:** <https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/get-ace-to-generate-a-specific-phrase-using-constraints/469>\
**Category:** ACE\
**Created:** [April 29, 2020, 2:11am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/get-ace-to-generate-a-specific-phrase-using-constraints/469 "2020-04-29T02:11:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![goodmami](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/b5e925/32.png) [@goodmami](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/goodmami)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 4:41am UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/get-ace-to-generate-a-specific-phrase-using-constraints/469/2 "2020-04-29T04:41:55Z")

</div>

I don’t think ACE does scope resolution at all and similarly does not understand scope-resolved forms of handle constraints. Much of our tooling has so far been content working only in the underspecified form.

You might look into the suggestions we had in the following thread: [Is there a way to indicate in MRS that the utterance is active voice?](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/is-there-a-way-to-indicate-in-mrs-that-the-utterance-is-active-voice/432)

---

_[View the full topic](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/get-ace-to-generate-a-specific-phrase-using-constraints/469)._