# Inheriting from head-valence-phrase and putting a single argument on the slash list

**URL:** <https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/inheriting-from-head-valence-phrase-and-putting-a-single-argument-on-the-slash-list/51>\
**Category:** Grammar Matrix\
**Tags:** error\_messages, analyses, hpsg, grammar\_matrix\
**Created:** [November 20, 2017, 10:14pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/inheriting-from-head-valence-phrase-and-putting-a-single-argument-on-the-slash-list/51 "2017-11-20T22:14:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ebender](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/34f0e0/32.png) [@ebender](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/u/ebender)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2017, 11:22pm UTC](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/inheriting-from-head-valence-phrase-and-putting-a-single-argument-on-the-slash-list/51/2 "2017-11-20T23:22:57Z")

</div>

This is because of the “lexical threading” analysis of SLASH, which is baked fairly deeply into the Grammar Matrix. The associated analysis of resumptive pronouns creates resumptive pronouns which themselves have non-empty SLASH values (coindexed with their own INDEX). Would that work for you?

---

_[View the full topic](https://delphinqa.ling.washington.edu/t/inheriting-from-head-valence-phrase-and-putting-a-single-argument-on-the-slash-list/51)._