With the current valence change library, is it possible to model something like this Chukchi sentence:
(1) inen- req -ekwʔi CAUS do.what -MYSTERY `What are you doing to me?' [ckt]
I cannot decipher the last suffix yet, unfortunately, but suppose even we could decide on how to gloss it in a meaningful way :). Suppose it means person/number information.
My question is, is there a way currently to model this, or will it not work if I don’t have overt arguments? I couldn’t quite figure it out. The verb has two predications in it inherently and does not inherit from either transitive or intransitive lex-item (it doesn’t make sense for this verb).
Here’s what I did and with this I can’t analyze the word lexically. But maybe there is a way of doing it? @curtosis